ISSN (0970-2083)

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Diesel Engine Exhaust Emissions Survey of Underground Mine In Indonesia

Arif Susanto*, Purwanto, Henna R Sunoko And Onny Setiani

School of Postgraduate Studies, University of Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

*Corresponding Author:
Arif Susanto
E-mail: arifssnt@yahoo.com

Received Date: 24 July, 2016; Accepted Date: 14 November, 2016

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Industrial Pollution Control

Abstract

Ambient air pollutant concentration measurement in underground mining is the first step in identifying environmental-health hazards and risk to the miners; that may result from exploitation of underground mining. Poor air quality in underground mining are generally caused by lack of air ventilation and the sources of contaminants. The objectives of this study were to characterize exposure to diesel engine exhaust emissions (DEE) from deep ore zone (DOZ) underground mining facilities, and to obtain spatial air quality for estimating miner’s exposure to from DEE pollutant including CO from gaseous product of combustion (POC) and DPM. Design of this research is an observational research with a cross sectional design. Data of air pollution were measured by using OSHA analytical method number ID-209 and NIOSH method number ID-6014 and 5040. Details of mining activities and vehicles characteristics among workers control system were recorded in relation to mining activities. Kriging method used to obtain quantitative information on workplace exposure to CO and DPM. The results that show that the concentration of CO will be in the highest range in value of 6.38 ppm to 7.92 ppm, while the concentration exceeding the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for DPM will range in value 643.26 μg/m3 to 618.23 μg/m3. From these results, concluded that the concentration mapping can be used to evaluate exposure-response relationships.

Key words

CO, DEE, DOZ, DPM, Spatially interpolation, Underground mining

Introduction

Studies of air pollution in Indonesia are limited and models from other countries are used to policy making related to regulatory decisions. Air pollution has become an important that requires attention due its impact on health and environmental. Epidemiological studies have shown that air pollution causes adverse human health effects (Lestiana, et. al. 2013) Pollution from motor vehicles constitutes one of the most ubiquitous environmental health problems and motor vehicle emissions are a major source of airborne pollutants (Parent, et al., 2013; Noue, et al., 2011).

Diesel engines have of industrial applications including in mining (off-road) The highest levels of elemental carbon were reported for enclosed underground work sites in mining (Rushton, 2012). Diesel-powered heavy equipment (HE) operating in underground environments (mines and tunnels) were determined by multiplying the vehicle power by a ventilation rate; that was either mandated by regulation(s) or determined empirically from known quantities (Parent, 2007).

DOZ (deep ore zone) copper mine is located in the province of Papua, Indonesia. A block cave layout is being developed to mine this deposit. The ore production started in November 2000 at rate of 2000 tonnes/day (tpd) and this rate is increase to 25,000 tpd by year 2003 (Calizaya, et al., 2001). Existing underground mine infrastructure change were required for both production and ventilation purposes. Ventilation system design to cover fresh air to all personnel working in the undercut, panel and/or truck haulage drifts (Figure 1).

icontrolpollution-Topographic-Truck

Figure 1: Topographic of Truck Haulage in DOZ underground mine.

DOZ mine airflow area provides sufficient for airways were required. Air control in the working areas can be challenging in block cave mines, because of the multiple parallel drifts on the extraction level and each extraction drift has an exhaust ventilation raise located near the center of the panel. The ore will be trammed by diesel loaders from the draw points to ore passes. Then dumped to a truck haulage level by fifty-ton trucks and the ore will be transport to primary underground crushing and conveyed to surface for processing. Airflow requirements were based on minimum velocity concern in main travel ways and dilution of diesel contamination (Stinnette and Souza, 2013)

Diesel engine exhaust (DEE) is a complex mixture of combustion products of diesel fuel, and the exact composition of the mixture depends on the nature of engine, operating conditions, lubricating oil, additives, emission control system, and fuel composition (Pronk, et al., 2009) and substances characterized by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) surrounding an elemental carbon core (Rushton, 2012) The principal gaseous components are carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) while the particulate fraction mainly comprises fine carbon particles formed by incomplete combustion. The carbon particles are mixed with organic vapours and gaseous derived from oil, unburned fuel and products of combustion and, as the mixture issues from the engine, it cools and the higher boiling organic materials condense onto the carbon particles k (Calizaya, et al., 2001).

DEE including diesel particulate matter (DPM) was classified as a known human carcinogen by the international agency for research on cancer (IARC) and (as a Group 1 classification) by the occupational safety and health administration (OSHA) and the mining safety and health administration (MSHA). To evaluate employee exposure, OSHA recommend monitoring for DEE constituents. The OSHA/MSHA hazard alert that was released in January 2013 regarding the carcinogenity of DPM suggested the miners monitor the DPM of at risk employees. OSHA recommends sampling for the gas phase component (CO, NO and NO2) of DPM to determine if at risk miners are exposed to DPM. A literature review suggested that the extrapolation of DPM from CO or NO2 levels may not accurately assess exposure to DPM. Miners are covered by the MSHA, and currently enforces DEE standards at underground metal mines. A miner’s personal exposure to DPM must not exceed 160 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) of total carbon (TC) when measured as an 8-hour-time-weighted average (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2016).

To obtain spatial interpolation analysis is using air dispersion model by numerically processing emission and meteorological data (Zou, et al., 2009). Kriging method is a common method used and represents spatially continuous phenomena. A method has formed the basis for environmental pollution mapping in recent years (Isaaks, et al., 2013). This report describes DOZ mine air quality exposure model for predicting CO and DPM concentrations to which the miners’ is exposed.

Method

Surveys method

Montoring reports indicated mining industry has higher levels and wider range of DEE exposure levels than other industries (Pronk, et al., 2009). Survey (Figure 2) were carried out in DOZ mine. Sample were collected simultaneously from October 2014 to September 2015. Measurement were taken to represent ambient conditions and a comprehensive chemical analysis was performed. The sampling and analytical methods for gaseous product of combustion (POC) concentrations for CO was measured performed with OSHA analytical method no. ID-209 (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2016) and for NO, and NO2 were measured performed with national institute for occupational safety and health (NIOSH) method no. ID-6014. Total carbon (TC) was defined as the sum of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC). Both EC and OC were measured performed by NIOSH Method No. 5040 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). Observation of microstructure to elemental analysis using scanning electron microscope (SEM) with JEOL JSM-6510Lowvacuum mode 5.0 nm (20 kV), magnification x5,000 to x20,000.

icontrolpollution-Flow-survey

Figure 2: Flow of the survey.

The implementation flow of the survey divided as below

Underground permissible exposure limit in mining: The composition of toxic gaseous and DPM concentration was taken from data analysis. Its peaks data without could provide information about spatial changes in the composition of the organic and gas component. Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for CO, NO and NO2 gas standard refer to Regulation of the Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration of Republic of Indonesia (Ministery of ManpowerandTransmigrationof Republic of Indonesia, 2011). MSHA currently enforces DPM standards at underground mines. A miner’s personal exposure to DPM must not exceed 160 μg/m3 of TC when measured as an 8-hour-time-weighted average (TWA). Most studies on conditions of exposure have concentrated on rather uncommon occupations involving high expsosure to diesel exhaust (Gamble, et al., 1987; Whittaker, et al., 1999; Groves, et al., 2007). and there have been few studies on exposure in common occupations with lower levels of exhaust. Litle is known about exposure in common occupations such as drivers or mechanics (Lewne, 2007). Due to complexity of the content of exhaust fumes, indicator substances are used to quantify the exposure. CO and NO2 has commonly been used as an indicator for diesel exhaust and CO was a major toxic component.

Determination of Miner’s Exposure to DPM

Exposure assessment (Figure 3) is the process of measuring or estimating the magnitude, frequency and duration of human exposure to a compound in the environment. Human exposure evaluation involved describing the nature and size of the population exposed to a air contaminants and magnitude and duration of their exposure. The dose, its duration and timing, the nature and size of the critical measures of exposure for risk characterization. It is possible to measure human exposure directly, by measuring levels of contaminants in the environment or by using personal monitors. Human exposures must be estimate by using measured concentrations in environmental in conjuction with models of human activity patterns (Birch, et al., 1996; Birch, et al., 2004).

icontrolpollution-Exposure-assessment

Figure 3: Exposure assessment and estimating intakes concept.

Result And Discussion

General Operation Characteristics

The DOZ mining main method used block caving, while the ore deposit is approximately 200 m wide and 900m long with maximum draw height of 350 m. In production, panel drift is equipped with a central ore pass. It to deliver the ore to the truck haulage level. Truck haulage level is a combination of chutes. It delivers the ore from the muck raises to a 1372 × 1956 mm gyratory crusher and discharged into an 1800-ton capacity ore bin, and bottom of this is equipped with an apron feeder, which discharges the ore in a 3500 tpd conveyor system. DOZ ore will be trammed by diesel loaders from the draw points to ore passes and dumped to a truck haulage level. 50 tons trucks on the haulage level will transport the ore to a primary underground crusher, and conveyed to surface for processing (Calizaya, et al., 2001)

The average ore production rate (Figure 4) in November 2000 at a rate of 2,000 tpd. Then increase to 25,000 tpd by year 2003. In October 2014 at a rate of 68,000 tpd, and decrease since January 2015 at a rate of 56,000 tpd.

icontrolpollution-production-rate

Figure 4: DOZ ore production rate in Oct 2014 to Sept 2015.

In the Table 1 shown a total number active panels, and number and size of main fans performance in operation during survey.

DOZ HP KW Pressure Air Quantity (m3/s)
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Fan #1 2200 1600 1,309 345 322 387 387 342 346 346 303 419 411 411 385
Fan #2 2200 1600 1,308 365 339 385 385 357 356 356 340 401 412 412 326
Fan #3 2200 1600 1,400 339 335 396 396 376 399 399 390 423 425 425 304
Fan #11 1000 746 2,78 305 275 229 185 185 203 203 229 229 229 200 171
Fan #12 1000 746 2,31 194 196 0 217 217 217 217 258 258 258 205 205
Fan #13 1000 746 2,37 200 187 191 186 186 211 211 182 182 182 180 180
Fan #14 1000 746 2,42 230 217 202 204 204 204 204 248 248 248 263 263
Fan #15 1000 746 2,29 183 185 189 154 154 198 198 193 193 193 187 187

Table 1: Main fans performance

Total airflow demand (Table 2) for DOZ underground mine is 1.498 m3/s. Airflow to each primary level, undercut, extraction and haulage was based on providing 0.079 m3/s/kW over diesel equipment and a minimum air velocity of 0.76 m/s in areas where personnel and non-diesel operate.

Exhaust Month
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
All access B/Hole-3 to 3186 Exhaust Drift 34 34 32 32 31 32 33 29 33 33 28 36
#1 Gallery Drift to V/raise 3186/L 384 384 292 346 371 343 439 400 400 400 382 390
#2 Gallery Drift to V/raise 3186/L 310 308 224 260 290 285 305 295 295 305 278 281
#2 Gallery Drift XC-1 to V/raise 3186/L 310 308 224 260 290 285 305 295 295 305 278 281
NED #1 Chamber 345 322 387 294 342 346 275 303 419 411 214 210
NED #2 Chamber 365 339 385 375 357 356 273 340 401 412 241 233
NED #3 Chamber 339 335 396 407 376 399 369 390 423 524 229 237
SVD Undercut V/R to 3186/L Exhaust Drift 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 154 151
Area-2 DOM Service and Access to 3186/L 3 4 7 5 7 7 6 6 6 7 50 40
Sucking DMLZ by NED #1 and NED #3 362 245 258 258 308 351 324 340 373 368 18 18
Total Exhaust 1788 1849 1749 1781 1816 1762 1741 1778 1959 1990 1872 1877

Table 2: Exhaust fans performance balance

Intake (Table 3) and exhaust (Table 4) airways were required to provide sufficient airflow. It caused by the multiple parallel drifts on the extraction (production) level to control block-caving mines. Concerning to main trainways, airflow required for dilution of DEE contamination and minimum velocity. Moreover, to provide fresh airflows to the mine, three main fans (fan #1, #2, and #3) will be operating for intake within an exhaust system (5m to 6 m diameter raises in parallel from the level of DOZ ventilation to surface).

Intake Month
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
DOZ Intake-1 437 442 363 311 288 307 348 387 389 464 408 161
DOZ Intake-2 340 278 215 176 257 204 25 33 32 397 240 294
DOZ Intake-3 77 86 283 388 398 424 410 417 431 146 215 188
DOZ Intake-4 847 850 727 768 790 785 874 890 1087 958 605 288
Upper rump intake 98 85 77 83 84 84 87 79 74 74 84 575
MLA Services Audit 66 68 68 48 45 45 47 56 62 62 62 119
Conveyor M-1 87 89 87 88 85 85 87 87 89 89 88 98
GRS-34 Conveyor 77 75 74 63 63 63 73 60 35 35 54 39
GRS-68 MLA 29 28 27 24 27 21 24 22 25 25 25 23
GRS-69 MLA 24 28 24 24 21 21 24 22 25 25 25 23
MLA access Conveyor Drift 28 25 22 26 26 34 26 25 43 43 26 29
DOM Top Service Drift 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Intake to DMLZ 362 245 258 258 308 351 324 340 373 368 0 0
Total Intake 1788 1849 1749 1781 1816 1762 1741 1778 1959 1990 1872 1877

Table 3: Intake fans performance balance

Type Unit Operational factor (%) Unit power (HP) Airflow/unit (m3/s) Total airflow
Axera 1 50 149 4.40 4.40
Axera 7 3 50 149 4.40 13.20
Commando 120 10 50 111 3.27 32.70
Commando 300 1 50 111 3.27 3.27
Cubex Drill 7 30 111 1.96 13.72
Medium Reach Drill 2 30 111 1.96 3.92
Robolter 1 30 111 1.96 1.96
EJC145 4 30 123 2.18 8.72
Elphinstone R1300 1 30 123 2,18 2.18
Elphinstone R1600 23 80 270 12.74 293.02
Elphinstone R1700 19 80 310 14.63 277.97
Elphinstone AD 30 1 80 400 18.88 18.88
Elphinestone AD 55 17 80 650 30.68 521.56
930 Series Loader 2 80 115 5.43 10.86
938 WH Loader 4 80 126 5.95 23.80
960 Series Loader 2 80 206 9.72 19.44
Boom Truck 5 30 81 1.43 7.15
Water Truck 2 30 81 1.43 2.86
Fire/Rescue Truck 1 20 81 0.96 0.96
Getman Flatbed 3 30 130 2.30 6.90
Getman Mixer Truck 11 30 154 2.73 30.03
Scissor Unit 12 50 81 2.39 28.68
Western Star Concrete Truck 2 30 380 6.73 13.46
Western Star Isotainer Truck 1 30 380 6.73 6.73
Backhoe 6 30 82 1.45 8.70
Crane 2 30 130 2.30 4.60
Grader 3 40 93 2.19 6.57
Forklift DP40 1 30 82 1.45 1.45
Shotcrete Sprayer 3 30 154 2.73 8.19
Water Canon 1 30 80 1.42 1.42
Telehandler 6 30 78 1.38 8.28
Iveco Bus 9 30 380 6.73 60.57
Isuzu Manhaul 3 30 380 6.73 20.19
Bobcat 2200 1 30 43 0.76 0.76
Bobcat 5600 1 30 43 0.76 0.76
Kubota Tractor 6 30 43 0.76 4.56
Personnel Vehicles 8 30 43 0.76 6.08
Personnel (people) 650 100 - 0.03 19.50
Total Required 1498.00

Table 4: Details on the type and quantity of diesel equipment in use and total airflow quantity

For ventilation system designed to assure all personnel working in truck hauage drifts in fresh air. Determination of airflow quantity that influence by mining equipment and wide variations in characteristics of emissions even amongst vehicle of similar size and power. The number of parameter affecting the total airflow required for amount of diesel equipment (Table 4).

Engine exhaust characteristics

The gaseous POC (from DEE) include CO, NO and NO2. Even diesel engines also produce water vapor; not considered as gaseous contaminant. Water vapor influence to the ambient of underground mining environment. Some of the gaseous present in DEE that established Regulation of the Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration of Republic of Indonesia (Ministery of ManpowerandTransmigrationof Republic of Indonesia, 2011) permissible exposure limit (PEL)s include CO and NO2 (Table 5). Quantification of CO and NO2 concentrations is to evaluate miners’ exposure to these harmful gaseous. CO average levels varied between 0 ppm to 3 ppm for drift and intake area, 0 ppm to 2 ppm for exhaust area, 0 ppm to 7 ppm for panel areas and 1 ppm to 8 ppm for haulage area. NO2 and CO have often been used historically as surrogate for DEE (Isaaks, et al., 2003). For this study, CO was selected to estimate relative difference in DEE concentrations over time. CO spatial data analysis (Figure 5) carried out by using ArcGIS (GIS Mapping) software and (Kriging) were used to interpolate CO concentrations.

icontrolpollution-Truck-Haulage

Figure 5: Distribution of DOZ Truck Haulage CO Concentrations.

Substances PEL
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 50 ppm
Nitric Oxide (NO) 25 ppm
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 5 ppm

Tabel 5: TWA-PEL Regulation of the Minsitry of Manpower and Transmigration of Republic of Indonesia

CO average levels varied between 0 ppm to 3 ppm for drift and intake area, 0 ppm to 2 ppm for exhaust area, 0 ppm to 7 ppm for panel areas and 1 ppm to 8 ppm for haulage area. NO2 and CO have often been used historically as surrogate for DEE (Isaaks, et al., 2003). For this study, CO was selected to estimate relative difference in DEE concentrations over time.

NO and NO2 levels were low 0 ppm in this survey. It is could be the use of a lower-sulphur diesel. In a Canadian railways company different occupations, no correlations were found between respirable combustible dust and NO2 or between EC and NO2. NO2 is secondary constituent of the exhaust gaseous and that the transformation from NO to NO2 depends on the levels of ozone and other photochemical oxidants. In underground mine, the transformation to NO2 is slower due to low levels of ozone.

Figure 5 shows the CO concentrations in truck haulage, an average CO concentrations was 3.0 ppm. Spatially continuous of CO concentrations mapping for points where there are no measurement data have to estimated, and can be done by a spatial interpolation. Measurement value both minimum and maximum CO and NO2 concentrations presented in Table 6. DPM generation varies considerably among types, sizes, series manufacturers of diesel engine. DPM behave as an aerosol (Stinnette and Souza, 2013). Being sub-micron in size (Figure 6) have aerodynamic diameters falling within a range 0.1 μm to 0.25 μm, its control is similar to other gaseous contaminant and classified by the international agency for research on cancer (IARC) as a Group 2A carcinogenic to human’s (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1989). Scanning electron microscopes are used in observations of microstructure to elemental analysis with JEOL JSM-6510Low-vacuum mode 5.0 nm (20 kV) and magnification x5,000 to x20,000.

icontrolpollution-Size-morphology

Figure 6: Size and morphology (SEM images) of DPM in truck haulage area with different magnification x5,000 (DPM size 0.344~1.682 μm); x10,000 (DPM size 0.297~2.005 μm); x15,000 (size 0.161~2.009 μm); and x20,000 (size 0.071~2.009 μm).

Agent n Average Min-Max PEL
CO-drift 14 1.2857 0-3.0 50
CO-exhaust 4 1.0 0-2.0 50
CO-haulage 14 3.0 1.0-8.0 50
CO-intake 3 1.0667 0-3.0 50
CO-panel 67 2.5672 0-7.0 50
NO2-drift 14 0 0 5
NO2-exhaust 4 0 0 5
NO2-haulage 14 0 0 5
NO2-intake 3 0 0 5
NO2-panel 67 0 0 5
NO-drift 14 0 0 25
NO-exhaust 4 0 0 25
NO-haulage 14 0 0 25
NO-intake 3 0 0 25
NO-panel 67 0 0 25

Table 6: Descriptive statistics of DOZ Truck Haulage for POC components

Figure 7 shows the DPM concentrations in truck haulage. Spatially continuous of DPM concentrations mapping for points where there are no measurement data have to estimated, and can be done by a spatial interpolation. Measurement value both minimum and maximum DPM concentrations presented in Table 7. Minimum airflow value of 0.03 m3/s/ worker Decree of the (Minister of Mines and Energy. 1995) and 0.067 m3/s/kW for DEE dilution as per Indonesian mining regulation (Minister of Mines and Energy. 1995). 0.080 m3/s/kW is a design value and is higher than the typical MSHA equipment quantities provided for gaseous compliance (McPherson, 1993). For truck haulage routes is 6.1 m/s as the maximum velocity. Ventilation for diesel shops based on the dilution of exhaust gaseous for two large loaders, which requires approximately 40.0 m3/s. Ventilation of non-diesel shops has been established at 23.5 m3/s based on experience at the mine. Airflow through the lube shop areas has been determined to be 28.2 m3/s based on expected equipment usage. Operating factors represent the percentage of time that the equipment will be running and have to applied to determine approximate airflow requirements.

icontrolpollution-Truck-Haulage

Figure 7: Distribution of DOZ Truck Haulage DPM Concentrations.

Area n Average Min-Max PEL
Access Center Crusher #1-2 2 42 0-84 160
Truck Haulage Shop 5 247.2 140-527 160
Maintenance Shop 2 164.5 154-175 160
Office Area 6 154.5 66-428 160
PM Shop 2 161 53-269 160
Welding Shop 3 172 90-272 160
West Empty Haulage 2 223.5 179-568 160
South Full Haulage 2 1151 1055-1247 160
Access #1HN to 1JS 2 171 0-342 160
Access South Empty 2 591 0-1182 160
Access West Full Haulage #10 2 263.5 0-527 160
Access West Full Haulage #1-6 2 214 0-428 160
Center Crusher #1 2 204 175-233 160
Center Crusher #2 2 185.5 160-211 160
LP#1 E-1F South 2 595.5 0-1191 160
LP#1 G South 2 591.5 0-1183 160
LP#1 H South 2 971.5 725-1218 160
LP#1 J South 2 198.5 194-203 160
LP#1 IE 2 798 759-837 160

Table 7: Descriptive statistics of DOZ Truck Haulage for DPM

Exposure and intake estimation

Many potentially hazardous gaseous mixtures exist in DOZ. The TLVs for references from national institute for occupational safety and health (NIOSH), the U.S. occupational safety and health administration (OSHA), the U.S. mine safety and health administration (MSHA) and the Indonesian Ministry of Mines and Energy.

NIOSH recommended exposure limits as timeweighted average (TWA) concentrations for up to a 10-hour workday during a 40-hour workweek (The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2016). The OSHA permissible exposure limits are from the OSHA general industry air contaminants standard (29 CFR 1910). The OSHA TWA concentrations must not be exceeded during any 8-hour workday of a 40-hour workweek (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2016). Additional ventilation requirements have also been provided based on Indonesian Mining Regulation and relate to a TWA based on working 8 hours/day and 40 hours/week (Ministery of ManpowerandTransmigrationof Republic of Indonesia).

DEE associated with diesel engines consists of various gases and diesel particulates. Diesel particulates usually less than one micron (μm or × 10-6 m), which causes them to be more easily inhaled and retained in the body. Presently the United States mining industry is in the process of phasing in stringent regulations relating to diesel particulates in underground mines. Exposure limits for DPM adopted by MSHA for metal or non-metal underground mines (non-coal). The present PEL for DPM as per MSHA (30 CFR 57.5060(b)) is 160 μgTC/ m3 (Safety and Health Standards-Underground Metal and Nonmetal Mines. 2016) (measurement of limit by the NIOSH 5040 method), with the defined as total carbon (TC) content (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016).

Conclusion

This survey shows distribution of CO and DPM concentrations predicted with an appropriate method by using Kriging Spatial Interpolation. This survey has the advantage to form DEE pollution mapping in DOZ mine and due to a lack of monitoring measurement in some locations. Kriging method can be used to obtain quantitative information on workplace exposure to CO and DPM. The results that show that the concentration of CO will be in the highest range in value of 6.38 ppm to 7.92 ppm, while the concentration exceeding the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for DPM will range in value 643.26 μg/m3 to 618.23 μg/m3. The results of this survey may be useful to assess the impact of diesel engine emission on health, especially for DOZ underground miners’ from estimation of exposure and intake in adequate occupational safety and health manner.

References

  1. Birch, M.E. and Cary, R. 1996.Elemental carbon-based method for occupational monitoring of particulate diesel exhaust:Methodology and exposure issues. 121: 1183-1190.
  2. Birch, M.E. and Noll, J.D. 2004.Submicrometer elemental carbon as selective measure if diesel particulate matter in coal mines. J. Environ. Monit. 6: 799-806.
  3. Calizaya, F., Karmawan, K. and Wallace, K.G. 2001. P.T. freeport DOZ mine ventilation system. 7th International Mine Ventilation Congress.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016.Diesel particulate matter (as Elemental Carbon).
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The national institute for occupational safety and health. 2016. (NIOSH) Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards.
  6. Decree of the minister of mines and energy. 1995. Number 555.K/26/M.PE/1995General mining occupational safety and health.
  7. Electronic code of federal regulations, U.S. publishing office. Part 57-Safety and health standards-Underground metal and nonmetal mines.2016.
  8. Gamble, J., Jones, W. and Minshall, S. 1987.Epidemiological-environmental study of diesel bus garage workers: Acute effects of NO2 and respirable particulate on the respiratory system.Environ. Res. 42: 201-214.
  9. Groves, J. and Cain, J.R. 2007. A survey of exposure to diesel engine exhaust emissions in the workplace.Ann. Occup. Hyg. 44:435-447.
  10. IARC (International agency for research on cancer), diesel and gasoline engine exhaust and some nitroarenes. 1989.
  11. Isaaks, E.H. and Srivastava, R.M. 2003.An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press.
  12. Lestiana, D.D., Santoso,M., Kurniawati, S. and Markwitz, A.2013.Characteristics of airborne particulate matter samples collected from two semi industrial sites in bandung.Indo. J. Chem. 13 : 271-277.
  13. Lewne, M., Plato, N. and Gustavsson, P. 2007.Exposure to particles, elemental carbon and nitrogen dioxide in workers exposed to motor exhaust.Ann. Occup. Hyg. 51 :693-701.
  14. McPherson, M.J. 1993. Subsurface environmental engineering, Published by Chapman and Hall. 905.
  15. Ministery of manpowerandtransmigrationof republic of Indonesia, regulation numberPER.13/MEN/X/2011 about threshold limit value for physical and chemicals factor at workplace. 2011.
  16. Noue, K. and Takano, H. 2011.Biology of diesel exhaust effects on allergic pulmonary inflammation. 131 : 367-371.
  17. Occupational safety and health administration, United States department of labor. Hazard Alert. 2016 Diesel Exhaust/Diesel Particulate Matter.
  18. Occupational safety and health administration, United States department of labor. Regulation (Standards-29 CFR) Part 1910.1000-Air contaminant, toxic and hazardous substances. 2016.
  19. Parent, M., Rousseau. M., Boffeta, P., Cohen, A. and Siemiatycki, J. 2007.Exposure to diesel and gasoline engine emissions and the risk of lung cancer. J. Epidemiol. 165 : 53-62.
  20. Pronk, A., Coble, J.B. and Stewart, P.A. 2009.Occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust: A literature review.J. Exp. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 19 : 443-457.
  21. Rushton, L. 2012.The problem with diesel: Editorials.J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 104 : 796-797.
  22. Stinnette, J.D. and Souza, E.D. 2013.Establishing total airflow requirements for underground metal/non metal mines with tier iv diesel equioment. 23rdworld mining congress and expo-Montreal, Quebec, August 2013.
  23. Whittaker, L.S., Macintosh, D.L. and Williams, P.L. 1999.Employee exposure to diesel exhaust fume. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 48: 368-376.
  24. Zou, B., Wilson, J.G., Zhan, F.B. and Zeng, Y. 2009.Air pollutant exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies. J. Environ. Monit. 11 : 475-490.

Copyright © 2024 Research and Reviews, All Rights Reserved